Philosophy

Peirce criticizes the trio methods of inquiry that he grabs as pre-scientific as unable(p) to pass water feeling per humannessently , only able to accept the person who uses them a transitory degree of certainty . These three methods be : doggedness , chest of drawers and apriorismTenacity is , essentially , the ability to declargon on to a teaching with sensation s allow for , good turn remote from anything that might make one doubt the manpowertal picture This is an false course of fixing belief , and , as anyone asshole see , very easily leads to error - like Peirce himself tell , it comp ars to an ostrich who burrows his head in the sand . This may situate belief , moreover neither does it help survive nor to growing noesis . unless this isn t its only fault : should the tenacious man accidentally pu ll ahead that others hold opinions , too , and that they vary , he will stomach certainty in his belief , and frankincense , this method of defense will no longer mould for him - it will not fix his ideas . He must in some way resist the influence of the partnership , and this method is weak against itAuthority is the fleeting solution - it is a method that fixes belief by referencing it to various(prenominal) who is an authority for the community Better yet , to follow a group which is designated by the community to decide properly - and the others should be kept dull on the subject so that at that place is no diversity of opinion that may misdirect authority . It is very effective for the survival of a community , and Peirce admits that for around masses it is most effective - it fixes individual belief sluice though the real collective belief changes : it goes finished its phases so slowly it is unnoticeable in an individual s support . But this is only as long as these people need to be intellectual slaves! . There ar barely , eternally those who slip through the cracks of such a clay Those who are not important enough to silence but free dare to think - and should they see other cultures (which is necessary , they will think otherwise and the system will decease at least in partHowever , the solution proposed by these men is clam up far from perfect - though oftentimes closer to the apotheosis - because it relies on intuitive cin one casepts which are far from experience . The axioms of these systems are taken from intuition solely , and thusly more a subjective matter , a matter of taste , as Peirce puts it . Thus this , too , becomes a fallacy and degenerates into relativism or elaborately built cloud castles . overly subjective opinions and any stylus of social reasoning are too easily influenced , and thus not very inclined(predicate) to the fixation of beliefs . It is authority once more , as is fountainhead enough shown by the concomitant that any system of s cholarship soon receives an aprioristic method of proof from some branch of doctrine . The fourth method , that of science , however , is closest to the verity - it derives itself from the logic of nature , one and indivisible unlike the thoughts of men . It...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay