This essay compares Salinger's Catcher in the Rye to Hemingway's For Whom the Bell Tolls in order to reveal the common plight of the two protagonists.

In the book, For Whom the Bell Tolls, the main character, Robert Jordan, is assigned the depute of blowing up a bridge during the Spanish Civil War. He is set about with galore(postnominal) conflicts and because of the ambiguity of his future, he does non think ahead intimately what his rush might be give care once he is guiltless and the warfare is over. He is unable to face complexity and tries to bend persuasion at all costs. Each age that he faces his motivation for killing, his mind is clouded with uncertainties and doubt. Jordan can non see by the present and, as a result, he good deals his conclude to the task at hand accordingly. The many times in the book, when he ponders on what his life might be like after the war, he stops himself, remembering that he is present for honourable one reason, to carry out the duties that were designated to him. He told himself, He would non think of himself into any defeatism. The first thing was to win the war. If we did not win the war everything was lost...he was serving in a war and he gave absolute loyalty and as complete semipublic presentation as he could give while he was serving. Robert Jordan programmed himself to thinking that he had no life after his service.

He was necessitate to do his job, and, after that, what lay ahead was insignificant. He did not look beyond the war for fear of macrocosm disappointed. in that location was a chance that he would breach and would not be able to accomplish what he longed to do. He devoted his life to fighting in order to succor the Spanish. Jordan tried not to look at anything other than the particularized tas! k set before him (the destruction of a bridge) and... If you sine qua non to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay