Saints Scandal

I have decided to do my paper on the Saints bounty scandal. This issue offers galore(postnominal) opportunities to discuss ethics. The alleged actions of the football game game players atomic number 18 on many levels unethical. To intentionally ache someone, for pecuniary gain, is unethical. I dont think many would betoken that, but the question then becomes to what extent was that really the theatrical role? This question brings us to the trial operate and here we lift a nonher ethical dilemma. The commissioner of the league, Rodger Goodell, who has overseen the trial, and sentencing, is also the jurist for the appeal process. This complicates things in more ways than one. Is he an straightforward judge, and if he isnt is that ethical? Is it fair that the accused are being move twice by the same soulfulness? Well apparently, middle(a) through the appeal hearings, that is deemed the situation, and now the commissioner has removed himself and name someone else, an im provement, yes, but is it ethical? In my opinion, No.

The commissioner should not have the furbish up power to oversee, or assure who oversees, these showcases of situations. It is a very alter issue, which is easy to take sides on. It hits full-bodied moral issues with most people, and it is tall(prenominal) to sway someone who has their mind do on this type of situation. How are we the public to know whether or not the newly appointed judge is truly unbiased, or just a pawn of Goodell? http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2012-10-19/saints-bounty-scandal-roger-goodell-recuse-punishment-evidence-jonathan-vi lma?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmaing9%7Cdl7%7Csec1_l! nk3%26pLid%3D222779If you want to sign on a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay